Features, formats, credits, and getting started – all in one place.
Features
Core Review
AI-powered line-by-line analysis of your sustainability report
Upload your ESRS report and receive structured, audit-grade comments in hours, not days. ReportingGPT reads every paragraph and flags issues an experienced auditor would catch – from missing evidence to inconsistent claims.
Supports .docx and .pdf files
Auto-detects report language (German or English) and year
Generates three comment types: Evidence, Clarification, and Proofreading
Comments reference specific ESRS disclosure requirements where applicable
Works on full reports or individual chapters
Evidence
Flags claims that lack supporting data, metrics, or source references. The most critical comment type for assurance readiness.
Clarification
Identifies ambiguous language, vague commitments, or statements that need more specificity to withstand audit scrutiny.
Proofreading
Catches inconsistencies, formatting issues, cross-reference errors, and terminology mismatches within the report.
Version Comparison
Track changes between two versions of your report
Upload an earlier draft and the latest version – ReportingGPT highlights what changed, what was added, and what was removed. Ideal for tracking revisions between review cycles.
Accepts .docx files only (no PDF – change tracking requires editable format)
Output is always .docx with tracked changes visible
Compares paragraph-level structure, not just text diffs
Particularly useful between first draft and auditor feedback round
Typical timeline: October through January (see lifecycle below)
Language Comparison
Compare your German and English report versions side by side
Many companies publish their ESRS report in both German and English. ReportingGPT compares both versions and flags translation inconsistencies, missing sections, and semantic drift between languages.
Supports .docx and .pdf files
Detects discrepancies in numbers, dates, KPIs, and commitments across languages
Flags sections present in one language but missing in the other
Typical timeline: from January onwards, after Version Comparison wraps up
Gap Report
Coming Soon
Systematic check against ESRS disclosure requirements
The Gap Report maps your sustainability report against the full list of ESRS disclosure requirements and data points. It identifies which requirements are covered, partially addressed, or entirely missing.
Maps against all 12 ESRS topical standards (E1–E5, S1–S4, G1) plus ESRS 2
Shows coverage percentage per standard and per disclosure requirement
Distinguishes between mandatory disclosures and those subject to materiality
Exportable as a structured working paper
Getting Started
1
Create an account
Sign up at review.reportinggpt.eu. Free plan includes 10 pages per month – no credit card required.
2
Create a project
Organize your reviews by project. One project per engagement or report keeps everything tidy.
3
Upload your report
Drop your .docx or .pdf file into the upload area. ReportingGPT auto-detects language and reporting year.
4
Select your review mode
Choose Core Review, Version Comparison, or Language Comparison. Each mode is optimised for a different stage in the reporting cycle.
5
Review and resolve comments
Browse AI-generated comments by type (Evidence, Clarification, Proofreading). Resolve, reply, or export – your workflow.
Formats & Credits
Supported Input Formats
.docx – Word documents. Required for Version Comparison.
.pdf – PDF files. Supported for Core Review and Language Comparison.
Note: .doc (legacy Word) is not supported. Please save as .docx first.
Output & Export
All review results are exportable as .docx with embedded comments.
Version Comparison output is always .docx with tracked changes – specifically designed for change-tracking workflows.
Credits & Pages
Credits are measured in pages. Each plan includes a monthly page allowance.
Credits can be used across all features – upload a full 120-page report or individual chapters, it is completely flexible.
When to use which feature – based on the typical ESRS reporting timeline.
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Core Review
Structured audit comments on your report
.docx, .pdf
Version Comparison
Track changes between draft cycles
.docx only
Language Comparison
Verify translation matches original
.docx, .pdf
Gap Report
Assurance readiness for sign-off
PDF, Word
Core Review
Oct – Feb
Structured audit comments on your report
Formats: .docx, .pdf
Version Comparison
Nov – Jan
Track changes between draft cycles
Formats: .docx only
Language Comparison
Jan – Feb
Verify translation matches original
Formats: .docx, .pdf
Gap Report
Feb +
Assurance readiness for sign-off
Formats: PDF, Word
Typical timeline – all features are available year-round.
Platform Features
Project Organisation
Group reports by engagement, client, or reporting year. Rename, favourite, and manage projects from the sidebar.
Audit Trail
Every action is logged – comment creation, resolution, editing, deletion. Full traceability for QMS documentation.
Export to .docx
Export the complete review with all comments embedded. Ready for sharing with colleagues or filing as a working paper.
Bilingual Interface
Switch between German and English in the profile settings. Review comments match the language of your uploaded report.
Auto-Detection
ReportingGPT automatically detects the language and reporting year of your uploaded document. No manual configuration needed.
Comment Management
Filter by comment type, search within comments, resolve or unresolve findings. All comments are structured by Evidence, Clarification, and Proofreading.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I upload individual chapters instead of the full report?
Yes. You can upload individual chapters, specific sections, or the complete report – whatever fits your workflow. Each user receives credits worth approximately 800 pages, which can be used flexibly across all features. In practice, chapters are often finished at different times, so this flexibility is by design.
Which file formats are supported?
ReportingGPT supports .docx and .pdf files. Note that Version Comparison only accepts .docx because tracked-change output requires an editable format. The output of Version Comparison is always .docx.
How do credits work?
Each plan includes a monthly page allowance (Free: 10 pages, Starter: 30 pages, Pro: 60 pages). Credits are consumed per page uploaded and can be used for any feature – Core Review, Version Comparison, or Language Comparison. Unused credits do not roll over.
What are the three comment types?
Evidence comments flag claims that lack supporting data or metrics. Clarification comments identify ambiguous or vague language. Proofreading comments catch inconsistencies, formatting issues, and cross-reference errors. Together, they mirror how an experienced auditor structures review findings.
Does ReportingGPT train on my reports?
No. Your reports are never used for model training. ReportingGPT runs on AWS Bedrock in Frankfurt (eu-central-1), where Anthropic has zero access to your prompts or responses. Data is processed in-session and not retained after analysis.
Which ESRS standards does the review cover?
Core Review covers all 12 ESRS topical standards (E1–E5, S1–S4, G1) plus ESRS 2 (General Disclosures). The AI references specific disclosure requirements and data points in its comments where applicable.
Can I use ReportingGPT for non-ESRS reports?
The tool is optimised for ESRS/CSRD sustainability reports, but it can review any structured document in .docx or .pdf format. Comment quality is highest for ESRS reports because the underlying knowledge base is built around European sustainability reporting standards.
How long does a review take?
An average 120-page ESRS report is analysed in under 10 minutes. You receive an in-app notification when the review is complete. The exact time depends on report length and server load.
Can I export the review results?
Yes. You can export the full review as a .docx file with all comments embedded. This makes it easy to share findings with colleagues or include them in your working papers.
Is there a German interface?
Yes. ReportingGPT supports both German and English as interface languages. You can switch languages in the profile settings. Review comments are generated in the language of the uploaded report.
What is the Audit Trail?
The Audit Trail logs every action taken on a report: when comments were generated, resolved, edited, or deleted, and by whom. This provides full traceability for quality management and documentation purposes.
Who built ReportingGPT?
ReportingGPT is developed by justReporting GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft – a licensed German audit firm. The tool was built by a licensed auditor who knows exactly what auditors look for when reviewing sustainability reports.
Still have questions?
We are happy to help. Reach out directly – no chatbot, no ticket queue.
